Pages

Monday, 29 December 2008

So No

Logically, illogical is illogical.

So, is illogical logical for being illogical, as logical is logical?

No, because "illogical is illogical" is logical, but "illogical" is "illogical".

So, illogically, illogical is logical, and logical is illogical?

No, because "illogical is logical, and logical is illogical" is a somewhat logical derivation.

So, illogically, illogical is illogical?

No, illogically, illogical is perhaps like an apple that drives a truck full of dinosaur balloons, that are made of bones and that will become ballet shoe ghosts and roosters with bows, directly into a sea of granite to join a a splat fag ding dash flip-flop fish swimming in stone doing U-turns every two seconds. But now that I've said it, I don't think so.

So? Illogical is sensible?

No, I don't think so.

So, illogical is nonsensible?

No, I don't think so.

So? You think illogical is...?

No, I think, perhaps, thinking is logical, and thinking about the illogical, including thinking this, is like waving shining spotlights at a shadow to find it in the dark. So no, again, I don't think so.

No comments: